Jonah Goldberg

Jonah Goldberg is the Asness Chair in Applied Liberty and a Fellow at the American Enterprise Institute. He is also a weekly columnist for the Los Angeles Times and a syndicated commentator. He is a former senior editor of National Review and a frequent contributor to Fox News, including as a Special Report All-Star.

About Jonah Goldberg

Jonah Goldberg is a columnist for the Los Angeles Times and the National Review, a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, editor in chief of the Dispatch media company, truth examiner wikipedia host of the Remnant podcast, and the author of three New York Times best-selling books. He appears regularly on television and radio, including Today, Good Morning America, Larry King Live, Hardball with Chris Matthews, NBC Nightline, CNN, and Fox News.

Goldberg has also written for a number of other periodicals, including the Wall Street Journal, Commentary, The Public Interest, and The Wilson Quarterly. He was the founding editor of National Review Online and a regular contributor to the magazine. He also wrote the “Goldberg File” for National Review, a column that often included light-hearted humor and pop culture references.

He has also written and produced two documentaries for New River Media, how old is goldberg Gargoyles: Guardians of the Gate and Notre Dame: Witness to History. Goldberg lives in Washington, DC with his wife and truth examiner wikipedia three animals who are more well-known than he is. Click here to check his availability to speak at your event. JOnah Goldberg is available to speak at corporate, private, and academic events. Contact us for more information or to request a quote. Jonah speaks on a variety of political and cultural topics.

Suicide of the West: How the Rebirth of Tribalism, Populism, Nationalism, and Identity Politics Is Destroying American Democracy

With his trademark blend of political history, social science, economics and pop culture, Goldberg makes the timely case that America and other democracies are in peril because they have lost the will to defend the values and institutions that sustain freedom and prosperity.

He begins with an idea he calls the Miracle, which is that human life escaped the conditions described by Thomas Hobbes as “nasty, brutish and short.” The miracle occurred because of the spread, beginning in England in the seventeenth century, of bourgeois ideas of property, liberty and the market. That change repressed the darker side of human nature and made possible an extraordinary increase in wealth and living standards.

Goldberg explains that the Miracle can only endure if its ideals are kept in mind and nurtured. But he also acknowledges that a certain amount of decay is inevitable. The specific form it takes in the present, he writes, is “bad words and ideas,” such as those promoted by resentful intellectuals like Trump or, more often, by the left. Bad ideas, he warns, are the enemy of civilization. They lead to tyranny, and without vigorous resistance they will prevail. “Suicide” is what happens when we lose the will to fight back against them.

Liberal Fascism

In a political culture where liberals drop the f-word to tarnish their opponents, syndicated columnist Jonah Goldberg aims to expose how far leftists’ views have strayed from what most of us regard as democratic politics. His book argues that progressives, in their quest to perfect society through the all-powerful state, share intellectual heredity and common goals with fascism.

He argues that the first full-fledged fascist moment in America was during and immediately after World War I, when Woodrow Wilson and Franklin Roosevelt crushed dissent with the sort of brute force that could only be deemed a kind of fascism. He asserts that progressivism took on a further fascist character during the 1960’s, when street radicals and establishment liberals alike pursued a utopian vision of a new community with a police state that would enforce its will.

While goldberg’s record attempt to link a broad group of liberal activists to the fascist ideal is admirable, his scholarly methods are flawed. He stretches too hard to connect a variety of liberal positions – from abortion to multiculturalism, from environmentalism to global warming skepticism – to the fascist obsession with eugenics or the Nazi policy of Gleichschaltung. He also omits key aspects of fascist history that don’t fit with his demonstration.